Systems through time

    Foundations and site in older Canadian homes

    What this means

    Era indicates the likely construction type and the drainage details that were normal at the time.

    What it does not mean

    It does not indicate structural adequacy. Cracks, movement and water entry require assessment against site conditions, not construction year.

    How to verify

    • Have a professional engineer assess anything suggesting movement or structural change
    • Review grading, downspout discharge and lot drainage during and after rain
    • Ask about sump systems, weeping tile replacement and any waterproofing work performed
    • Request permits for underpinning, basement lowering or structural alterations

    Foundations and site by construction era

    Swipe sideways to compare columns

    Foundations and site practice by Canadian construction era, and what to verify today
    EraCommon at the timeVerify today
    Before 1920Rubble stone or unreinforced concreteMortar condition, prior repointing and any underpinning
    1920–1939Poured concrete and block basementsWater entry pathways and drainage upgrades
    1940–1959Poured concrete basements with limited damp-proofingWeeping tile status and sump provision
    1960–1969Poured concrete with perimeter drainageGrading changes made by landscaping over time
    1970–1979Poured concrete, damp-proofing standardFinished-basement concealment of foundation walls
    1980–1989Reinforced concrete with drainage membranes in some marketsDrainage discharge and sump operation
    1990–1999Engineered foundation designs commonAny engineered repair documentation

    Who can assess this

    • Professional engineer (structural)
    • Home inspector for visible conditions
    • Municipal building department for permit history